Contact: Jeff Miller, Alameda Creek Alliance, (510) 499-9185
Oakland, CA â€“ The Alameda Creek Alliance filed a lawsuit in Alameda Superior Court today against the California Department of Transportation challenging the inadequate environmental review for the first phase of the controversial $80 million Niles Canyon highway widening project along Alameda Creek. Caltrans failed to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (â€œEIRâ€) for the State Route 84 â€œSafety Improvementâ€ Project despite substantial evidence of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts to sensitive species including the California red-legged frog and Alameda whipsnake.
â€œCaltrans is trying to ram this ill-conceived project through with complete disregard for public input and over the continued objections of conservation groups, elected officials, and community groups from Niles and Sunol,â€ said Jeff Miller, director of the Alameda Creek Alliance. â€œThe highway widening would degrade important habitat for fish and wildlife, jeopardize a decade of steelhead trout restoration efforts in Alameda Creek, and ruin the natural beauty of Niles Canyon. We insist on a thorough environmental review and reevaluation of whether this type of highway widening project with drastic impacts is even necessary.â€
The lawsuit alleges violations of the California Environmental Quality Act. In 2006 Caltrans approved a â€œNegative Declarationâ€ for the project, claiming no significant environmental impacts, rather than preparing the required EIR for a project with significant impacts. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Regional Water Quality Control Board and Alameda Creek Alliance submitted comments about potentially significant adverse impacts and the need for further environmental review. Caltrans failed to provide proper notice of project approval to the public and those who commented on the draft environmental review.
Caltrans cut nearly 100 native trees in the canyon this spring in preparation for the project, in the process violating several provisions of a permit issued by the Water Board. Caltrans has stated it intends to commence project implementation on June 15, including removing tree stumps and other vegetation, grading and filling in the creek channel and floodplain, and building huge retaining walls, which would cause further damage to habitat for trout, frogs and snakes.
â€œCaltrans refused to conduct a transparent environmental review and did not properly notify or give the public and interested agencies opportunity to provide meaningful input,â€ said Miller. â€œDespite these inadequacies and the fact that no one in the community wants the highway widened, Caltrans refused to put the project on hold, so we have sued them. The Governor should investigate this blatant waste of $80 million in public funds and shameful destruction of important wildlife habitat in Alameda Creek.â€
Caltrans began environmental review for phase two of the project, which would cut nearly 500 more trees in the middle of the canyon and construct almost two additional miles of retaining walls and armoring along the creek, in fall 2010. The proposal received a flood of comments and storm of protest from the community. The Water Board commented it â€œwould be unlikely to issue the necessary approvals for this projectâ€ due to significant environmental impacts. Caltrans recently agreed to reopen the public comment period for phase two of the project through July 7, to â€œsolicit additional input from the public in determining the possible scope of a modified project.â€ Construction on the second phase is scheduled to begin in 2012.
The City of Fremont sent a letter to Governor Jerry Brown in May requesting he intervene to stop the project, citing â€œextremeâ€ and â€œshockingâ€ environmental impacts and â€œblatant disregard for getting input from the public.â€ Fremont is investigating a ban on large trucks in the canyon, since trucks cause a disproportionate number (38%) of traffic accidents and most of the fatal accidents. Fremont joined conservation and community groups in calling for a halt to the project and reevaluation of the need for road widening when a truck ban is in place. Nearly 400 residents showed up to oppose the project at meetings with Caltrans this spring and community groups held several protests against the tree cutting. Save Niles Canyon, Save Our Sunol, Friends of Coyote Hills, Southern Alameda County Sierra Club, East Bay Chapter of the California Native Plant Society and Tri-City Ecology Center are also opposing the project.
Save Niles Canyon reviewed safety data Caltrans used to justify the road widening, premised on a need for safety upgrade due to high numbers of fatal accidents. Caltrans has cited 11 to 13 fatalities in the canyon over the past decade, but several of these incidents were outside the canyon or the project area, and the majority involved driving under the influence as a major or contributing cause of the accident. It is unlikely these incidents would have been prevented by road widening in the canyon. Save Niles Canyon concluded that Niles Canyon Road is statistically safer than the average state road, there is no safety justification for road widening, and the project may actually make the canyon more dangerous for drivers and cyclists. There are less destructive alternatives Caltrans has not evaluated such as installing radar speed signs, median barriers, and rumble strips, focusing on localized problem areas, trimming or removing selected trees, or other measures within the existing roadway.
The three phases of the project would widen much of Niles Canyon Road between Fremont and Interstate 680 to provide 12-foot lanes, a 2-foot median, and up to 8-foot shoulders. Caltrans proposes cutting 600 trees along Alameda Creek and filling the creek and floodplain with over four miles of cement retaining walls and rip-rap. This would significantly damage wildlife habitat and remove rare sycamore forest.
Alameda Creek is an â€˜anchor watershedâ€™ considered regionally significant for restoration of threatened steelhead trout to the entire Bay Area. Since 1997, numerous organizations and agencies have cooperated on restoration projects to allow migratory fish from the Bay to reach spawning habitat in upper Alameda Creek. Thirteen fish passage improvement projects, including dam removals, construction of fish ladders, and installation of fish screens, have been completed in the watershed since 2001. Several more projects in the lower creek are expected to be completed by 2013, allowing steelhead to migrate upstream into Niles Canyon in the project area and into the upper watershed for the first time in half a century.